How DevOps Differs from Traditional IT, and Which One is Better


DevOps enhances collaboration, while traditional IT upholds stability. Knowing when to automate and when to rely on stability is key. Organisations must choose their strategy wisely for optimal outcomes in varied industries. A balance of both DevOps and traditional IT generally works well.

In the rapidly evolving landscape of information technology (IT), two distinct approaches to software development and IT operations have emerged: DevOps and traditional IT. These approaches differ in their methodologies, emphasis, and outcomes. In this article, we will explore the key characteristics of DevOps and traditional IT, and compare how they apply to two different organisations – a stock broker and a healthcare organisation. By understanding how each approach aligns with the unique needs and objectives of these organisations, we can gain insights into which method might be more suitable for their specific contexts.

Overview of DevOps and traditional IT

DevOps is a collaborative approach that encourages seamless communication and cooperation between software developers and IT operations teams. Its main focus is on breaking down silos and promoting a culture of continuous learning and improvement. By integrating development and operations, DevOps aims to accelerate software delivery, enhance product quality, and increase customer satisfaction.

Traditional IT follows a more rigid and compartmentalised structure, with distinct development and operations teams. Communication between these teams may be limited, leading to potential delays and misunderstandings. Traditional IT emphasises stability, control, and well-established processes to maintain reliable IT services and software.

DevOps for a stockbroker organisation

DevOps’ collaborative approach and adaptability align perfectly with the fast-paced demands of stock brokers.

Collaboration and communication: In a stockbroker organisation, DevOps facilitates seamless communication between the development team, responsible for building trading platforms and applications, and the operations team, responsible for maintaining the trading infrastructure. This collaboration ensures that both teams understand the unique requirements of the financial industry and work together to deliver stable and efficient trading solutions.

Emphasis on automation: Automation in a stockbroker organisation expedites the deployment of software updates, allowing for faster response times to market fluctuations. Automated testing also ensures that trading applications are reliable and secure, which are critical factors in highly competitive and time-sensitive financial markets.

Continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD): With DevOps, the stockbroker organisation can implement continuous integration to integrate code changes frequently, ensuring a consistent and stable codebase. Continuous deployment enables rapid release cycles for new features and improvements, providing traders with the latest tools and functionalities.

Customer-centric approach: DevOps encourages gathering feedback from traders to understand their needs better and deliver solutions tailored to their requirements. A customer-centric approach helps the stockbroker organisation stay ahead of competitors and offer exceptional trading experiences.

Flexibility and agility: In the fast-paced world of finance, DevOps’ flexibility and agility are invaluable. The ability to respond quickly to market changes and emerging trends gives the stockbroker organisation a competitive edge and helps them adapt to dynamic market conditions.

Learning from failures: In the stockbroker context, learning from failures is crucial to identify potential risks and vulnerabilities in trading systems. DevOps’ culture of learning and continuous improvement leads to robust risk management strategies and more resilient trading platforms.

Traditional IT for a healthcare organisation

Traditional IT may shine through in the critical healthcare sector.

Silos between development and operations: In a healthcare organisation, traditional IT may maintain separate development and operations teams. Developers focus on creating healthcare software applications, while operations teams handle infrastructure and data management. This structure can lead to potential communication gaps between the teams, affecting the seamless integration of healthcare solutions.

Reliance on manual processes: Traditional IT practices may involve manual testing and deployment of healthcare software. While this approach prioritises stability, it may result in longer deployment cycles and delayed access to critical healthcare applications.

Infrequent releases: Healthcare organisations often prioritise stability and regulatory compliance. As a result, they may prefer infrequent software releases that bundle multiple changes together. This approach may limit the agility of the organisation to respond quickly to emerging healthcare needs.

Stability-centric approach: In the healthcare industry, stability is crucial to ensure patient safety and regulatory compliance. Traditional IT’s focus on maintaining reliable systems aligns with the healthcare organisation’s objective of providing secure and dependable services.

Formal change management: Healthcare organisations may adopt a formal change management process to ensure that any software updates or changes adhere to strict regulatory requirements. This approach helps mitigate risks associated with software changes in a highly sensitive environment.

Comparing DevOps and traditional IT in stockbroker and healthcare organisations

In the stockbroker organisation, DevOps’ emphasis on collaboration, automation, and rapid release cycles aligns well with the dynamic nature of financial markets. The customer-centric approach enables the organisation to deliver trading solutions that meet the specific needs of traders. The flexibility and learning from failures help the stockbroker organisation adapt to evolving market conditions and regulatory changes.

In contrast, the healthcare organisation may prioritise traditional IT’s stability-centric approach to maintain reliable healthcare systems. The formal change management process helps ensure compliance with stringent healthcare regulations, while the reliance on manual processes may reduce the risk of unintended disruptions in critical healthcare applications.

Which approach is better?

In determining the better approach between DevOps and traditional IT for a stockbroker or healthcare organisation, several factors come into play.

  • Context matters: Organisation’s needs and objectives The choice between DevOps and traditional IT depends on the specific context, goals, and constraints of the organisation. Each approach offers distinct benefits that align with different business requirements.
  • When DevOps is better DevOps is better suited for a stock broker organisation, as speed and agility are crucial to respond quickly to market fluctuations. A customer-centric focus is needed to deliver personalised trading experiences. Flexibility is essential to adapt to changing market conditions and regulatory requirements.
  • When traditional IT is better Traditional IT is more suitable for a healthcare organisation as stability and reliability are paramount to ensure patient safety and regulatory compliance. A formal change management process is required to mitigate risks in a sensitive healthcare environment. A risk-averse approach is preferred to prioritise patient well-being.

Considerations for choosing an approach

Several factors influence the decision.

  • Organisational size and complexity: Larger organisations may benefit from DevOps to streamline operations, while smaller ones may find traditional IT sufficient.
  • Resource availability: Implementing DevOps may require significant investments in tools and training.
  • Industry and compliance requirements: Traditional IT aligns with industries with strict regulatory demands, such as healthcare.
  • Organisational culture: The willingness to embrace change and collaboration in adopting DevOps is a consideration.
  • Hybrid approach: In some cases, a hybrid approach that combines elements of both DevOps and traditional IT can offer a balanced solution. Organisations can leverage the strengths of each approach to suit their specific needs.

A stockbroker organisation may adopt a hybrid approach by applying DevOps principles for rapid trading platform updates and customer-centric features, while maintaining traditional IT practices for stability in the core infrastructure.

A healthcare organisation could adopt a hybrid approach by using DevOps for non-critical applications, enabling rapid deployment of patient engagement tools, while maintaining traditional IT for critical healthcare systems, ensuring stability and compliance.

The comparison between DevOps and traditional IT in the context of a stockbroker and a healthcare organisation highlights the importance of tailoring IT management approaches to specific industry needs and objectives. DevOps offers speed, collaboration, and customer focus, making it an attractive option for organisations seeking innovation and adaptability. Traditional IT prioritises stability and reliability, making it more suitable for industries with stringent compliance requirements and risk-averse environments.

Ultimately, successful IT management for any organisation requires thoughtful consideration of its unique context and a careful balance between the strengths of DevOps and a traditional IT-like hybrid approach. By understanding the benefits and limitations of each approach, organisations can make informed decisions that optimise software development, IT operations, and ultimately, their ability to deliver value to their customers and stakeholders.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here